Previous Page  23 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

20 1 6 WA I T I NG L I S T S S URV E Y R E POR T

2 3

Variability

Waiting list management practices and technology vary widely between Ontario’s 47 service

managers. There is also variability within and between some service managers’ portfolios.

The number of new applications reported is likely an underestimate as the data on the number of new

applications for some service managers does not include households who applied and were housed in

the same year due to the technology limitations of their waiting list management systems.

This variability, coupled with the absence of a shared database system and differences in human

resource, financial, and technical capacity between service managers, makes it difficult to ensure

direct comparability between areas

23

.

23.

The definitions of applicant statuses such as “transfer”, “pending”, “cancelled”, “housed”, or “household” may vary between service

managers and can impact comparison. Similarly, service managers may define “modified units” differently. Service manager cate-

gorization of applicants by household composition or size of unit can impact their ability to accurately report by household type. For

example, if a service manager categorizes applicants by the size of the unit requested (and not the composition of the household),

some respondents may be unable to separate couples without children from single adults because both household types are eligible

for the same size of unit. In other instances, service managers may categorize childless couples in the family category, inflating the

number of families reported.